All posts by mjfelker1980

The Ship’s Going Down Fast

More Zune fallout:

Zune Sinks– Forbes

The new Zune Marketplace is even stupider. Microsoft is trying to break open Apple’s near monopoly of the music market, so they’re launching an online music store that competes with iTunes. The only difference here is that iTunes is simple, elegant, and intuitive. The Zune Marketplace seems like the polar opposite. It has fewer songs. No audiobooks or podcasts. It doesn’t sell movies or TV shows. And if you actually want to buy a song, you’ve got to lay out big chunks of cash and jump through more hoops than a circus lion. Get a load of this passage from Walt Mossberg’s Journal review:

“To buy even a single 99-cent song from the Zune store, you have to purchase blocks of “points” from Microsoft, in increments of at least $5. You can’t just click and have the 99 cents deducted from a credit card, as you can with iTunes. You must first add points to your account, then buy songs with these points. So, even if you are buying only one song, you have to allow Microsoft, one of the world’s richest companies, to hold on to at least $4.01 of your money until you buy another. And the point system is deceptive. Songs are priced at 79 points, which some people might think means 79 cents. But 79 points actually cost 99 cents.”

Don’t feel bad if you have to go back and read that a few times before it makes sense –I know I did. Buying music from Microsoft seems awkward, over-complicated, and designed from the bottom up to squeeze every last cent out of the consumer.

Tune Into Zune? by Steven Levy (Newsweek)

What’s more, when I tried to send a Rolling Stones song I just bought on the Zune Marketplace to another Zune, I got a message reading, “Can’t receive songs because of rights restrictions.” Huh? Microsoft says that in a minority of cases it was unable to secure artist rights for even this limited form of sharing, and that’s the message you get when you try to send songs from those holdouts. Seems to me that when you buy those non-sharable songs from the Zune Marketplace you should be warned about this. But Microsoft says that they have no plans to give you that information, even if it makes you look like an idiot when you waste a friend’s time by trying to send a song and getting only that insulting error message.

Full Disclosure: Levy’s book The Perfect Thing: How the iPod Shuffles Commerce, Culture, and Coolness is in my Top Ten Books of 2006

Ok, so it looks like the Zune player is being plauged by setbacks and detractors- on its launch day!!! However, let me say two things.

1) I like the choice to add the color brown. Every article has been overly critical of this palete choice. I say good move.

2) It does look pretty. The Newsweek article had a great picture:
061109_zune_vlwidec.jpg

The Social is a tough place. Better bring you’re A game.

If It’s Not Remarkable It’s Not Worth My $250

09pogue2l.jpgToday/Tomorrow Microsoft releases its much hyped hoped iPod killer, Zune. First off let me say that I welcome the Zune because I welcome open and free competition. It makes products better. It keeps companies on their toes. However, I have no expectations that the Zune player will help push portable music into a new era. It seems rushed and for every good thing (wireless sharing) there are a half dozen out-right failures (the strings attached to wireless sharing) in creating something truly remarkable. Take this review from the New York Times. It is all over the map.

As it turns out, the player is excellent. It can’t touch the iPod’s looks or coolness, but it’s certainly more practical. It’s coated in slightly rubberized plastic, available in white, black or brown — yes, brown. It won’t turn heads, but it won’t get fingerprinty and scratched, either. It sounds just as good as the iPod.

The Zune looks cooler than the iPod but it won’t turn heads? Strike One

The Zune matches the price ($250) and capacity of the 30-gigabyte iPod. But it’s noticeably thicker (0.6 inch vs. 0.4), taller (4.4 inches vs. 4.1) and heavier (5.6 ounces vs. 4.8). Battery life is the same for music playback (14 hours), slightly better for video (4 hours vs. 3.5).

It has the same battery life, storage capacity, and it costs the exact same price as an iPod but it is larger, heavier, and more cumbersome? Strike Two.

The Zune 1.0 player is pretty barren, too. It doesn’t have a single standard iPod amenity: no games, alarm clock, stopwatch, world clock, password-protected volume limiter, equalizer, calendar, address book or notes module.

Ball 1.

Incredibly, you can’t even use the Zune as an external hard drive, as you can with just about every other player on earth — an extremely handy option for carting around big computer files.

Foul Ball.

The big, whomping Zune news, though, is wireless sharing. The Zune has a built-in Wi-Fi antenna. (Turning it on costs you one hour of battery life.) During the playback of any photo or song, you can view a list of Zunes within 30 feet. Sending a song takes about 15 seconds, a photo 2 seconds; you can’t send videos at all. Your lucky recipient can accept or decline your offering — and, if you have really terrible taste, can block your Zune permanently.

It all works well enough, but it’s just so weird that Zunes can connect only to each other. Who’d build a Wi-Fi device that can’t connect to a wireless network — to sync with your PC, for example? Nor to an Internet hot spot, to download music directly?

Microsoft also faces what’s known as the Dilemma of the First Guy With a Telephone: Who you gonna call? The Zune will have to rack up some truly amazing sales before it’s easy to find sharing partners.

(Skip down one paragraph) The bigger problem, though, is the draconian copy protection on beamed music (though not photos). You can play a transmitted song only three times, all within three days. After that, it expires. You’re left with only a text tag that shows up on your PC so that — how convenient! — you can buy the song from Microsoft’s store.

This copy protection is as strict as a 19th-century schoolmarm. Just playing half the song (or one minute, whichever comes first) counts as one “play.” You can never resend a song to the same friend. A beamed song can’t be passed along to a third person, either.

What’s really nuts is that the restrictions even stomp on your own musical creations. Microsoft’s literature suggests that if you have a struggling rock band, you could “put your demo recordings on your Zune” and “when you’re out in public, you can send the songs to your friends.” What it doesn’t say: “And then three days later, just when buzz about your band is beginning to build, your songs disappear from everyone’s Zunes, making you look like an idiot.”

Microsoft says that the wireless sharing is a new way to discover music. But you can’t shake the feeling that it’s all just a big plug for Microsoft’s music store. If it’s truly about the joy of music discovery, why doesn’t Microsoft let you buy your discoveries from any of the PlaysForSure stores?

Strike 3.

I know what you’re thinking, “Micheal, we all know that you’ve taken the iPod kool-aid! iTunes has copyright restrictions, the iPod battery life stinks, it has had its day in the sun. You’re just blinded to new things that aren’t Apple products.”

No, I’m not blinded by my love for my iPod. The Zune does have a couple of neat bells and wistles that I would like to see on the next iPod.

Things like customization of the menus. On the Zune you can use any photo as the wallpaper making a truly unique device that can show off your distinctive personality.

Sorry to say, but I am underwhelmed by the Zune. Grossly underwhelmed. I was hoping for something great. Instead we were given something that reeks of corporate think-tankery- A product that latches onto the market to make a quick buck instead of driving the market forward to bigger and better things.

I wish the Zune the best but history’s landfills are filled with thousands products that promised big but delivered too little. The iPod has dominated our commerce, our vocabulary, and even our cultural identities. When I’m at the gym inevitably someone with an iPod will see me using mine and will give me a nod. Silently we know that we are part of something: brothers and sisters in the world of music appreciation. Will Zune users experience that same sense of camaraderie? That same sence of knowing? We shall see.

The consumers begin to vote with their wallets this week and by Christmas we should have a better idea of how long the Zune will last.

Yes, Welcome to the Social.

This Is Youth Ministry

There are times when I’m teaching that I say the same prayer that Dilbert is offering up here. I can work on and hone each and every anaology or example or reference to make sure that they will truly drive my point home but once the words leave my mouth they become public domain for anyone to jump off into the deep end of teenage fascination and discussion.

Sometimes it is maddeningly frustrating.

Mostly though I just try and gather up all the conversations and smile knowing that I was once where they were. Last week.

Are You Willing to Make The Hard Changes Now?

From Seth Godin’s Small is the New Big:

My first job was cleaning the grease off the hot-dog roaster at the carousel snack bar, near my home in Buffalo. Actually, it wasn’t a roaster. It was more a series of nails that rotated under a lightbulb. I also had to make the coffee and scrub the place clean every night. it very quickly became obvious to me that I didn’t have much of a future in food service.

I didn’t have to make many decisions in my job. And the manager of the store didn’t exactly look to me to initiate change. In fact, she didn’t want anyone to initiate change. (My suggestion that we branch out into frozen yogurt fell on deaf ears, as did my plea that it would be a lot cheaper to boil hot dogs on demand than to keep them on the rack under the lightbulb all day.)

Any change, any innovation, any risk at all would lead to some sort of terrible outcome for her, she believed.

After I set a record by breaking three coffee carafes in one shift, my food-service career was over. I was out on the street, unemployed at the tender age of 16. But from that first job, I learned a lot — and those lessons keep getting reinforced.

Just about every day, I go to a meeting where I meet my boss from the snack bar. Okay, it’s not really her. But it’s someone just like her: a corporate middle-person who’s desperately trying to reconcile the status quo with a passionate desire to survive. My boss didn’t want to jeopardize her job. She viewed every day and every interaction not as an opportunity but as a threat — a threat not to the company but to her own well-being. If she had a mantra, it was “Don’t blow it.”

In her business, she faced two choices: to die by the guillotine, a horrible but quick death, or to perish slowly on the rack — which is just as painful a way to go, if not more so, and guaranteed to leave you every bit as dead. But in her nightmares, only one of those two options loomed large — the guillotine.

I have to admit it. I have the same dream.

Have you ever spent a night worrying about what your boss (or your stockbroker or a big customer) is going to say to you at that meeting the next morning? Have you ever worried about some impending moment of doom? That’s fear of the guillotine.

But almost no one worries about the rack. We don’t quake in our boots about a layoff that’s going to happen two years from now if we don’t migrate our systems before our competition does. We’re not afraid of stagnating and dying slowly. No, we’re more afraid of sudden death, even though the guillotine is probably a far better way to die.

Recently, at the invitation of the president of a company, I visited its operation in Chicago. This company is a household name, a financial-services giant. And its people know that the Internet represents a huge threat to their future.

When I get there, people are so earnest. They’ve all done their homework. They all take notes and ask questions. At first, it seems as if they’re doing everything right to prepare for the future. They’ve got an Internet task force, and it reports directly to the president. It’s a high-profile gig: Lots of senior people are on this team, and virtually every department in the company has a representative on it.

The team is busy hiring consultants, building prototypes, creating business models, and generally working hard to get the company in shape for the next century.

I give my talk, and team members invite me to sit in on a presentation by the company’s top marketing person. We sit down in a huge conference room, with a fantastic view of the lake, a silver tea set on a sideboard, and custom-printed yellow pads placed in front of everyone.

After the presentation — which sounds all too much like state-of-the-art Internet strategy circa 1996 — they ask me what I think.

I look around, and that’s when I realize that every single person in the room is waiting for me to say the same thing. They want to hear, “Hey, you guys are totally prepared for the Net. Don’t worry about it.” They want to hear, “Hey, this Web thing isn’t a threat to your business model. You don’t need to change a thing.” They want to be told that everything will be fine.

And the really sad and amazing thing is that they don’t care if I’m wrong. The idea that their company could end up like Waldenbooks or CBS or Sears or any other big, dumb company is just fine — as long as they don’t have to change now.

What was going on here? I had just met a group of smart, aggressive, well-compensated people, who control billions of dollars in assets and one of the best brand names in the world. Yet they knew they were going to fail, and they couldn’t do a thing about it. They had all bought into a system in which it’s just fine to fail on the big stuff — as long as little failures don’t happen now.

Let’s be honest.

Nobody likes change.

Real change, earth-shattering change, stay-up-all-night-worrying change isn’t fun. At most companies, it’s a huge threat, an opportunity for failure, a chance to see the stock plummet, to watch divisions get axed, to hear customers scream and yell. We’re organized to resist big change at every turn.

The problem is that today we don’t have a choice. We can’t leave innovation to the small guys, the startups that have nothing to lose. Either we change our businesses, or they die.

Resisting change is natural, sometimes even healthy. In today’s world, though, it can be deadly.

Businesses that don’t change disappear. Winners change; losers don’t.

At the Carousel Snack Bar, I learned three lessons that are just as valid now, 23 years later, as they were then. The first is that you should never take a job that requires you to bring your own grease rag to work. Second, jobs in which you don’t initiate change are never as challenging, fun, or well paid as those in which you do. And third, companies that don’t change vanish.

It’s easy to see those lessons at work on the Net, but change isn’t just about the Internet. When the Internet is old news, companies still will be turning over. Remember DeSoto and Pierce-Arrow and Dusenberg and Packard and American Motors? How about Borland and Spinnaker Software and Ashton-Tate and (almost) Apple? Or A&M Records? Or Orion Pictures?

In the long run, we’re all dead. The same is true for companies, divisions, and brands. Sooner or later, the place where you work is going to disappear. You’re not safe, no matter where you are. Your company is going to fail or be acquired or acquire another company, and you’ll lose your job. Or you’ll lose interest in your job.

One way or another, sooner or later, you’re going to leave. So why not take some risks along the way? Here’s the question: Are you going to be a change agent, or are you going to keep bringing your own grease rag to work?

The biggest gripe that I hear from folks at companies with two or more employees is that someone else in their company is impeding change, that “they” don’t get it, won’t endorse it, won’t allow it to happen. If you’re one of the folks offering up one of those excuses, I’ve got news for you: What you’re looking for isn’t change. What you’re looking for is an official endorsement of the risk-free status quo.

It’s possible to have a great corporate career, to make a difference, to add significant value to your company. But the best way to do that is to instigate and execute change, to risk your job on a nearly constant basis — because every job risk enhances your career.

Imagine that you’re on a boat. It’s a big boat, and it’s got a leak. Actually, it’s got a hole. Belowdecks, your colleagues are busy bailing: They’ve got cans and hoses and even a pump, and they’re bailing water as fast as they can. The optimists in the group are pointing out that no one has drowned yet, and that maybe a giant piece of kelp will come along and get stuck in the hole and plug it up.

Up on the deck, senior management is saying, “Full speed ahead.” Sure, every once in a while a vice president notices that the ship isn’t quite as high in the water as it was. And the rest can’t help noticing that many of the boats around them are sinking. But, frankly, they’ve got a pretty good gig, and all of the alternatives that they can think of involve getting wet.

And there, about 50 feet away, is a brand-new boat, a boat with no leaks, no holes. And nobody’s on it. So here’s the question: Why not go for it?

Big-company CEOs almost never complain to me about employees who take too many risks. They almost never whine about a workforce that’s busy with new initiatives at the expense of the core business. And they don’t complain when people stand up and fight for ideas, standards, and quality that they absolutely believe in. But they almost always talk about people who play it too safe, who avoid risks, and who are dooming their company to mediocrity and, ultimately, death.

What are you going to do? Risk the sharks in the water, get your brand-new Lacoste shirt wet, and go for a swim? Or grab a can and start bailing, even though you know this baby’s going under? What will it be? The guillotine or the rack?

By the way, the last time I visited my parents in Buffalo, I drove by the Carousel Snack Bar. It’s closed — bankrupt, I think. And I bet that spending those last few years on the rack was no fun at all.

Seth Godin (sgodin@fastcompany.com) is the author of “Permission Marketing: Turning Strangers into Friends, and Friends into Customers” (Simon & Schuster, 1999).

In my life I have had the opportunity to work for men and women who were willing to do the hard thing. They traded present security in order to make changes that had the potential to secure the future. Win or lose the organizition was better for it. We worked harder and with greater enthusiasm because we knew that we were standing on the edge of greatness. When we were faced with failure we stood together and quickly rallied with a new idea or perspective to keep us on track. There is no greater feeling.

Conversely, I have worked with my fair share of people who simply try and avoid the guillotine not realizing that they have resigned themselves, their organization, employees, and shareholders to an aggonzing, slow death on the rack of irrelevance.

What about you? Anybody out there want to work for someone that simply avoids the hard stuff?

Not me. I am willing to make the hard changes. I’ll start by making the changes within myself.

link

Ooops!!! Faith Hill Is a Jerk

Ohhhh! It doesn’t get much worse than that. To be honest though, I’m surprised this doesn’t happen more often.

I guess Faith Hill’s big beef would be that Underwood is an American Idol winner and hasn’t “paid her dues.” No excuse for that behavior though.

Hill’s publisist has stated that her client was only joking but that seems like spin.

Especially since after she screams “What!?!?!” It looks as though she says, “That’s such b***s***.”

Funny joke huh? It’s lonely at the bottom.

USA Today
Reality TV Mag
link

2007: The Year of William Wilburforce

I am making a bold prediction here. Over the last few weeks I have heard the name William Wilberforce over and over and over. 2007 is going to be his year. And with good reason.

Wilberforce was a member of British parliment near the end of the 18th century. In 1784, a great change occured in his life. He became a Christian.

This great change influenced the way he lived and lit a new fire in his belly. Wilberforce set out to abolish slavery in all of the British Empire. It became his all consuming passion. He dedicated the rest of his life to this end. Friends were lost and enemies were made but he never gave up. For 34 years, he continued to push for an end to the “horrors of the slave trade.”

One month after he passed away, Parliment passed the Slavery Abolition Act, freeing all slaves within the Brish empire.

One man. One Faith. One Pursuit. Millions of lives changed.

Wlden Media will release Amazing Grace: The William Wilberforce Story next Spring. I hope you all get to see it.

In conjuction with the movie, you can sign an online petition that has as its aim to abolish slavery world wide. Click over there and sign it or download it and pass it around to those around you.

I wish that there were a few canidates out there that had these kinds of ideas. I would gladly vote for any man or woman that stood for something like justice and truth instead of just a donkey or an elephant.

Bio